Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 48%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: ground level    Credibility level   infowars link    
  Relevant (Beta): 40%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Anyway, Never thought I'd say this, but, I'm with Iran on this one! It seems THEY were the good guys here! Unbelievable as it may seem!
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Eartha Kitt    dum   trustworthy partner   trustworthy partners  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
You're right, they are totally untrustworthy. They initiated a coup that toppled our government in 1953, then they put in a ravenous dictator who was in power for a quarter century. Then when we finally overthrew that dictator, they imposed sanctions on us and backed the Iraqis when we went to war with them, even though Iraq was a tyrannical country who had no qualms with invading neighboring countries to get out of paying their debts to them...............................oh, whoops. That was the US who did those things to Iran!!!!!!!! It actually makes my wonder why people wonder why Iran is so unfriendly with the US.
  Considerate: 50%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: ravenous dictator    tyrannical country   quarter century   coup  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Or maybe it has something to do with the fact that for publicly supporting the US people get 10 years in prison in Iran, while for carrying a board with words "Death to Israel! Death to America!" on it people get free university admissions. Pretty hard to be friendly towards the US in such conditions.
Pahlavi's regime was actually easily the softest and most prosperous regime in Iranian history, and one of the several regimes that were not ruled by religious fundamentalists. Almost everyone who escaped the regime of Ayatollahs said that things were much better under the US-friendly regime, than under current socialist theocrats.
Blaming the US for people revolting and supporting totalitarian Islamic fundamentalists makes little sense, and was not even a part of my comment. I am not sure where your drive to constantly jab at the US, regardless of what the topic is, comes from.
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.18  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
I have no intention to make jabs at the US. I only intend to jab those who think my taxes should be spent on wars that only cause more wars and cost taxpayers money. Is your argument for regime change really going to be because they have boards that say death to America?!?!? I don't care if they have boards that say death to piloteer from DI, I still don't want to have to pay to have a regime change. Personally, If Canada caused a blockade of the US, you may just see me with a sign that says death to hockey fans!!! I think they may have some reasons as to why they have those signs.
If the US was concerned about keeping religious fundamentals out of control of Iran, why did they overthrow Mosaddegh who was considered the leading champion of secular democratic Iran? Wow, you seem to not have done to much study into the Shah.
" An Amnesty International assessment on Iran for 1974–1975 stated:
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
You may have confused this thread with another one on a similar subject. In this one we are talking about who is responsible for Iran leaving the nuclear deal; nobody has said anything about supporting regime change in Iran. Granted, I would not mind seeing that regime fall, but that is a different matter entirely.
I have never said that The Shah's regime was "soft and prosperous". I merely said that it was the softest and most prosperous regime in Iranian history, which, to be frank, is not a high standard.
You are preaching to the wrong crowd: I would love seeing a system with no taxes at all, so obviously I do not support the government spending its people's taxes on foreign interventions. But since the money is already in the hands of the government, and since the government does not know do much about improving the domestic economy, it might as well spend the money on something that will make this world a better place. Whether intervention in Iran would do so or not, I do not know. I do know, however, that Iranian regime is vicious and I do not want the US to make any friendly deal with it, until it has undergone a massive secular and free market reformation.
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
I have to admit that you are correct. I went entirely off subject for the sake of shamelessly attempting to prove my point, which has nothing to do with the topic at hand. I apologize to you and Yeshua for that.
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 57%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: sake    point   subject   topic  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
No worries, all is well. I was happy to have the discussion, even if it went slightly off the topic.
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 44%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: worries    discussion   topic    
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra